ralph
i turned on meet the press yesterday morning just in time to see ralph nader tell tim russert that he’s going to run for president.
i disagree with ralph nader on most major issues, but i say “good for you, ralph”. and shame on those people who tried to keep him out. he should be included in the “debates” (which are really more like joint press conferences), as well.
why? even though i disagree with nader and would never vote for him for president, i don’t think he should be excluded from the process because if he were, what would stop the two corporate parties from excluding an independent candidate with whom i sympathized? where does that end?
mr. president and sen. kerry (presuming he’s the dems’ guy), have some class. you know nader isn’t going to beat either one of you. let him participate.
recent comments