Comments on: distrusting atheists

By: neil

neil — Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:32:41 +0000

haha, it WAS a little under the radar

By: j.d.

j.d. — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:42:41 +0000

I think every person on Earth who read this mentally blocked out the last line (before the update).

By: neil

neil — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:48:22 +0000

Well I sent it over cause, as a future doc, I don’t like the idea of people not trusting me cause of my lack of religious views. I agree that your average self-proclaimed coffee shop atheist is pretty insufferable, but “athiest” is a pretty loaded word and there are those who don’t believe in any god that, while technically athiests, would never use that word as a descriptor of themselves cause of the aformentioned loadedness of the word.

Anyway, the stats were interesting if they were real.

By: Lyn

Lyn — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:52:15 +0000

I like your irony. Good post. Keep blogging. Lyn from Bloggin’ Outoud (but on hiatus)

By: j.d.

j.d. — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 20:16:46 +0000

Not quite. It’s more the presentation of the message.

I don’t object to the message or messengers at all (other than finding them annoying), although a certain “progressive” we both know along with his mouth-breathing commenters have mischaracterized this post as such. And the search for civilization continues…

By: Joel

Joel — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:54:52 +0000

You know what I think is far more insufferable than the message? The messenger!

Or am I reading you wrong…