http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/archives/2023 take the next step Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:11:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/archives/2023/comment-page-1#comment-1177 j.d. Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:07:44 +0000 http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/?p=2023#comment-1177 It just <em>seemed</em> pretty cut-and-dried. I knew it would be a matter of time. It just seemed pretty cut-and-dried. I knew it would be a matter of time.

]]> http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/archives/2023/comment-page-1#comment-1173 Beldar Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:11:45 +0000 http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/?p=2023#comment-1173 Great post. Thanks for the link and the ping. Tracking through all the constitutional analysis, various standards of review for particular classes of people, etc., can get pretty gnarly; they spend weeks on that stuff in con law in law school. But figuring out whether Judge Roberts gets his jollies by seeing 12-year-old girls arrested? Your post absolutely proves that a nonlawyer can do that just fine, so long as he/she is willing to look at the source material and not just accept verbatim the mischaracterizations put out by the anti-Roberts interest groups and their MSM allies (like Ms. Lithwick). Great post. Thanks for the link and the ping. Tracking through all the constitutional analysis, various standards of review for particular classes of people, etc., can get pretty gnarly; they spend weeks on that stuff in con law in law school. But figuring out whether Judge Roberts gets his jollies by seeing 12-year-old girls arrested? Your post absolutely proves that a nonlawyer can do that just fine, so long as he/she is willing to look at the source material and not just accept verbatim the mischaracterizations put out by the anti-Roberts interest groups and their MSM allies (like Ms. Lithwick).

]]>