<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a note about statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/archives/1635/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/archives/1635</link>
	<description>take the next step</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: j.d.</title>
		<link>http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/archives/1635/comment-page-1#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>j.d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolution-nextstep.net/archives/2005/02/15/a-note-about-statistics/#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Awstats keeps track of visits, page views, and hits separately, and doesn&#039;t count bots. My stats logs say I&#039;ve had about 21,000 visits since June of &#039;04.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awstats keeps track of visits, page views, and hits separately, and doesn&#8217;t count bots. My stats logs say I&#8217;ve had about 21,000 visits since June of &#8216;04.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.evolution-nextstep.com/archives/1635/comment-page-1#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolution-nextstep.net/archives/2005/02/15/a-note-about-statistics/#comment-799</guid>
		<description>When people say that Site Meter is under reporting, they are usually comparing Site Meter &quot;visits&quot; to something like &quot;hits&quot; or &quot;page views&quot; on their internal logs. If you can get your logs to only report the pages view counts for the pages where you&#039;ve added the Site Meter counter and you remove any page views that were generated by spiders, it should be within about 5% of Site Meter&#039;s &quot;page view&quot; count for your site. Here is a page that may help with the comparison. 

http://www.sitemeter.com/?action=help&amp;area=COMPARE
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people say that Site Meter is under reporting, they are usually comparing Site Meter &#8220;visits&#8221; to something like &#8220;hits&#8221; or &#8220;page views&#8221; on their internal logs. If you can get your logs to only report the pages view counts for the pages where you&#8217;ve added the Site Meter counter and you remove any page views that were generated by spiders, it should be within about 5% of Site Meter&#8217;s &#8220;page view&#8221; count for your site. Here is a page that may help with the comparison. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sitemeter.com/?action=help&amp;area=COMPARE" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitemeter.com/?action=help&amp;area=COMPARE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
